Sen. Lindsey Graham – the driving force behind the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in the Senate – appears willing to consider alterations to RAWA that would create an exemption for online lottery sales.
That’s per a report in GamblingCompliance (p/w).
Graham told GamblingCompliance.com that he isn’t seeking to block online lottery sales, and that his office is “talking with” those who believe RAWA would ban such sales to “see if we can find some accommodation.”
It’s unclear how Graham’s (apparent) flexibility vis-à-vis online lottery will comport with Rep. Jason Chaffetz’s vision for RAWA in the House.
Chaffetz reportedly recently told state lottery officials to introduce their own bill if they didn’t like RAWA’s approach to online lottery sales.
Graham’s willingness to move online lottery sales into the “approved” column also seems at odds with Sheldon Adelson, who is a driving force behind the push to federally ban regulated online gambling.
In early March, Las Vegas Sands’ Andy Abboud told GamblingCompliance that he didn’t see “any appetite” for a carveout for lotteries that chose to move into online sales “based on their simple interpretation of the Wire Act.
A lottery carveout would add to the numerous exemptions already found within RAWA:
At that point, RAWA would effectively only ban state-regulated online poker and casino games and (possibly) similar tribal operations. That’s it.
And lottery games are already rapidly converging with slot machines. Have a look at the Michigan Lottery’s online offering for a ready example. So RAWA wouldn’t so much ban online casino as force it to reshape to fit into a lottery mold.
All other forms of online gambling are either not within the purview of federal law or already rendered illegal by existing law.
So what’s left?
The casino games that can’t be readily (or profitably) turned into a lottery experience and state-legalized online poker.
With four states already offering online lottery and some dozen others at various points of considering online sales, the lotto lobby has been one of the most vocal opponents of RAWA.
— Steve Tetreault (@STetreaultDC) March 25, 2015
A recent letter from Kentucky Lottery head Arthur Gleason to his state’s Congressional delegation captured the tone and tenor of the broader opposition:
As President & CEO of the Kentucky Lottery Corporation (KLC), I am writing to ask you to oppose the adoption of the proposed Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA). As Congress contemplates addressing Internet wagering again, I hope you will preserve our state’s right to offer lottery ticket sales over the Internet and protect the existing sales channels used by the KLC. If enacted, RAWA poses a significant threat to both future and existing lottery sales in Kentucky.
Read a synopsis of additional lotto-driven criticism of RAWA here.
One of the more telling moments during the recent House hearing for RAWA came when Rep. Cedric Richmond – who was a co-sponsor of RAWA in 2014 – forcefully raised the point that RAWA would shut down online lottery sales.
Richmond asked the panel what would happen to the lottery if RAWA passed. Only Parry Aftab offered an answer:
Aftab: "If RAWA passes, your lottery goes offline." Rep. Richmond: "Does anyone disagree?" No one disagrees #RAWA
— Chris Grove (@OPReport) March 25, 2015