- US Online Poker
- US Online Casinos
- US Online Sports Betting
- FEATURE: Ontario Online Gambling
An effort by the Sheldon Adelson-backed Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling (CSIG) to secure support from state attorneys general for a federal ban on regulated Internet gambling has stumbled short of its goal.
According to a report from GamblingCompliance.com, only 15 state attorneys general, along with the attorney general from Guam, signed the letter circulated by CSIG calling for an update to the Wire Act to prohibit state-regulated online poker and gambling.
In order to qualify as a statement of policy by the National Association of Attorneys General (NAGA), the letter would have needed to attract 36 signatures – more than double the amount secured by CSIG’s campaign.
And the level of support is dramatically less than that accomplished by past attempts, a point not lost on the PPA’s John Pappas.
“We would have liked to have seen none sign the letter, but 15 is far less than more than 40 who signed the letter in 2007,” Pappas told GamblingCompliance.
The letter was signed by AGs in Arizona, Florida, Hawaii, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming, along with Guam.
Of the group, 13 are Republicans and three are Democrats.
What accounts for the plummeting levels of support for such initiatives among state attorneys general?
The Adelson-backed proposal to update the Wire Act would effectively roll back those industries, along with online lotteries.
Reconciling that level of federal intervention into a state-based industry with the full-throated support of states’ rights that is the official position of NAGA may have simply been too severe of a logical contortion for the overwhelming majority of state attorneys general.
This article utilizes content, with permission, from GamblingCompliance.com, a leading provider of independent business intelligence to the global gambling industry. Visit GamblingCompliance here.